Dysphagia Knowledge Hub — 吞嚥困難知識庫

Case Study 1: Mild Dysphagia in a 72-Year-Old Woman

Patient Presentation

Mrs. L is a 72-year-old retired schoolteacher referred to the outpatient speech-language therapy clinic by her general practitioner. She reports a 6-month history of food “sticking” in her throat when eating solid foods, particularly bread, rice, and raw vegetables. She has also noticed occasional coughing when drinking thin liquids, especially in the mornings.

She denies weight loss, recurrent chest infections, or pain on swallowing. She lives independently with her husband, cooks her own meals, and continues to socialise over meals with friends. She is concerned about the coughing in public.

Past medical history: Hypertension (well-controlled on amlodipine), osteoarthritis. No history of stroke, neurological disease, or head and neck cancer.

Current medications: Amlodipine 5 mg, calcium + vitamin D supplement.

Nutrition: BMI 22.5 kg/m². No recent weight change reported.


Initial Screening Findings

EAT-10 (self-completed in clinic waiting room):

Water Swallow Test (50 mL, Kubota):


Clinical Swallowing Examination

The SLT conducted a full clinical swallowing examination (CSE), supplemented by a brief GUSS-style progressive consistency challenge.

Observations:

GUSS score: Part 1 = 5/5; Part 2 semi-solid = 5/5; liquid = 3/5 (coughing on thin, no cough on thickened); solid = 4/5. Total GUSS = 17/20 — mild dysphagia


VFSS Decision

Given the mild clinical picture, clear history, absence of red flags (weight loss, aspiration pneumonia, progressive neurological symptoms), and Mrs. L’s intact cough response, VFSS was deferred in favour of empirical trial of texture modification with clear safety-netting criteria for urgent VFSS referral if:


Management Plan

Dietary prescription:

Rehabilitation exercises:

Caregiver / self-management education:


3-Month Outcome

At 3-month review:


Learning Points

  1. EAT-10 captures impact: Mrs. L’s EAT-10 score of 11 reflected moderate symptom burden despite her appearing “well” to the referrer. The questionnaire prompted appropriate priority referral.
  2. Empirical management is appropriate for mild dysphagia with intact cough response and no red flags, provided clear safety-netting is in place.
  3. Rehabilitation exercises improve outcomes: Neck-modified CTAR was appropriate given her cervical osteoarthritis — always tailor exercises to the individual.
  4. Home education matters: Teaching the IDDSI Flow Test empowers patients to self-monitor compliance.

References

  1. Belafsky PC, et al. (2008). Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 117(12):919–24. PMID: 18349030
  2. Trapl M, et al. (2007). Dysphagia bedside screening for acute-stroke patients: the Gugging Swallowing Screen. Stroke, 38(11):2948–52. PMID: 17894481
  3. Yoon WL, et al. (2014). Chin tuck against resistance (CTAR): a novel exercise for dysphagia rehabilitation. J Oral Rehabil, 41(1):23–9. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12108